Hi Brian, > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote: >> The heartbeats are an interesting problem. I haven't yet made my mind about >> them. AFAICT the only real use cases for heartbeats is in high-availability >> systems to initiate fail-over. > > Yes, that is the usage case that we have. Even if the heartbeat > doesn't go into 0MQ itself, it would be nice if the device API were > more public so projects could create their own devices. It is such a > simple API, that this shouldn't be an issue once we figure out the > full device API.
What exactly do you mean by "device API"? AFAIU everyone is free to implement his own device even now. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
