Matt Weinstein wrote: > I've implemented a first version of the zmq_nothrow. > > It's not brilliant, and maybe it's better not to do it, it's very > un-C++-like. > > However, since I've done it, I'm attaching for your thoughts -- > > A few questions: > > - is __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) generally used? (I've used it > here since you don't expect a class not to throw :-))
That's gcc-ism IMO. > - I've added an error_ value to zmq_message_t. Not beautiful. Any > alternatives? Yes. That's kind of strange. The only reason is to catch the errors during the message initialisation? > Anyway, I'll use this domestically and wring out any misfeatures. > > Comments welcome -- please :-) Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
