On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Oliver Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I find "socket" quite confusing , all my work is inproc or via IPC an no >> where am I using TCP sockets.. Yeah, but these are 0MQ sockets, not TCP sockets. I've collected the various suggestions, normalized them to fit the existing terms used in the zmq_socket(3) man page where possible and put them onto a page for discussion: http://www.zeromq.org/draft:socket-type-names Martin points out to me that renaming the socket types would create an API break. Oliver's suggestion is to use aliases specifically to help newbies. This seems to avoid an API break. Hopefully this can lead to code examples that make sense to beginners right away, without undue pain to API implementors and those who have already learned the existing names. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
