Brian Granger wrote: > Most importantly, KEY != VALUE. That is, the name we use to refer to > each socket does not have to include all the information about the > socket, it merely has to be a unique identifier that is not confusing. > The longer naming schemes feel like they are trying to put the VALUE > into the KEY, i.e., all of the details of the socket into the name of > the socket.
It reminds me of hungarian notation. m_rgiNumbers happens to mean "member variable of type 'array of integers' that is called 'numbers'". I never understood what is the prefix good for given that I can get exactly the same information from looking at the variable declaration. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
