On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Chuck Remes <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am wondering if I am misusing the framework. Briefly, the crash occurs when > calling zmq_close from another thread on a socket that is blocked on > send/recv. It sometimes asserts on object.cpp line 342, sometimes hangs, > sometimes segfaults, etc. > > I thought it would be safe to call zmq_close on sockets in other threads > since calling zmq_term can safely do so. Am I wrong? If so, what is a safe > way to signal a blocked socket so it can cleanly shut itself down (without > calling zmq_term)? Calling close on a socket that is not owned by that thread is not safe afaik. The correct way to signal any socket is to send it a message. - Pieter Hintjens iMatix - www.imatix.com _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
