FWIW I reviewed the patch and it looks great :-) On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would rather say the distinction is between common day-by-day patches >> and big codebase changes. For the former, the mailing list process is >> sufficient. And there's no real reason why the maintainer should not >> follow the process. > > I guess the maintainer can use the list to solicit review of patches, > that's a nice idea. That's especially valuable when we're fixing > issues people have been worrying about. If there are no "clients" for > a change (yet), it's a bit pointless to announce it. > > Remember, though, that the process for the maintainer is different > than the process for contributors, for good reasons, and there's no > benefit in trying to make these a single process. > > -Pieter > > > -- > - > Pieter Hintjens > iMatix - www.imatix.com >
-- - Pieter Hintjens iMatix - www.imatix.com _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
