2010/9/23 Mikael Helbo Kjær <[email protected]> > I've gotten a build of 2.0.9, but I haven't tested it unlike the 32-bit > build, but they are the same except for some settings in Visual Studio. Oh > and I had to give up on getting OpenPGM to work as its windows support is > very bad and its 64-bit support is even worse. It depends on GCC extensions > which is the biggest problem. I was unable to make compatible OpenPGM DLLs > for my stuff (I needed them without buffer security and without wchar_t as a > native type to be compatible with Qt). > > That would be OpenPGM 2.1, with OpenPGM 5 that can build native in MSVC 2010 or cross compiled with MinGW-w64. Current development is fixing a busy wait issue with 0MQ, subsequently the Windows port will be re-built and iMatix will offer binary packages and bespoke customisations.
It's not GCC extensions that are the biggest problem as they all can be disabled, the larger problem for Windows is the lack of C99 support in MSVC. -- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
