On 09/28/2010 11:17 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
> Thanks everyone for pointing our my mistake here.  But I then have a
> secondary question.  Currently it is possible to crash a REP socket by
> not adhering to the REQ/REP protocol.  Don't we want to make it more
> difficult to crash a REP server than this?

Definitely. I've introduced the logging mechanism (sys://log) to 2.1 so 
any violation of the protocol can be handled by silently discarding the 
offending message and logging the fact, so that admin can take 
appropriate measures.

Martin

_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to