Hi, On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Martin Lucina <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] said: >> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Martin Lucina <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Debian stable has 2.61 (see >> > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=autoconf), 0MQ requires 2.61. >> > >> > No problem here as far as I can see. >> >> Then it must have been an older Debian. Nonetheless it impossible to >> continue and we had to switch to ... ugh... RedHat. > > Run 'make dist' on a new enough machine and use the resulting tarball. > Problem solved.
Ok, valid point. So no need to provide a rhel patch right ? >> > Also, autoconf is only required when building from Git. >> >> Which means at least the Java bindings and presumably also others. >> >> I recall Steve asking the same question about autoconf some time ago: >> do we really need 2.61? Anything that raises the barrier on building >> 0MQ is a problem. > > To be honest, autoconf 2.59 was released in *2003*. So I'm not inclined to > support that; I don't even have a distribution here that uses it, *and* > (I repeat myself) normal users should be using release tarballs/tarballs > made from "make dist". > > FWIW autoconf 2.61 was released in 2006 so it's not new by any definition. > > -mato > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > -- Stefan Majer _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
