Burak, On 3 November 2010 07:57, Burak Arslan <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) the zeromq-2.0.10 release is still remotely crashable, so you need a > trusted network. encryption does not make sense in a trusted network.
I don't follow your logic here. Knowing enough about a network to allay concerns of rogue clients crashing your servers doesn't preclude wanting your message payloads encrypted, AFAICT. I agree that, e.g., across the internet you want both hardened servers and encryption (actually you want the former all the time!). Basically what I mean is that "trust" is not black and white, you might for example trust your network enough to leave most traffic unencrypted but wish to encrypt certain messages - perhaps pertaining to personal information. In fact, it's not much of a stretch to imagine cases where policy requires message encryption even in a highly secure and trusted network. ~B _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
