Yes, it works perfectly with new changes. Thanks. -- SM
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:03 PM, gonzalo diethelm <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think Scott's complain regarding supporting deregisteration of >> socket in poller was very relevant as I myself faced this issue. I >> tried to create similar "remove" interface for my own use. Refer patch >> for the same. > > I have just added an unregister() method based on your patch with some > changes; notice the different name for the method. > > Please let me know if it works for you. > > -- > Gonzalo Diethelm > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
