Pieter,

the decision if the patch is worth going to trunk is up to you.

Thank you for the explanation of 2.1.x status. 
I'll give it a try.

09.03.2011, 17:01, "Pieter Hintjens" <[email protected]>:
> 2011/3/9 Ilja Golshtein <[email protected]>;:
>
>>  I've backported the patch to 2.0.10 in straightforward way (attached).
>>  Unfortunately it does not solve the problem, though significantly
>>  reduce possibility of the crash.
>
> OK, thanks for this patch!  I'll make a 2.0.11 release shortly in any case.
>
>>  I've got stuck: 2.0.10 does not work for me, although 2.1.x
>>  is a release candidate and does not seem suitable for production usage.
>
> If you can wait a very short while (1 week or so), we'll have a 2.1.3
> stable release out the door.
>
> The rc2 is extremely stable, heavily tested, and if you're having
> trouble with 2.0.10, I'd absolutely recommend upgrading to 2.1.2. The
> one area there's still work going on is around OpenPGM integration.
> Everything else appears solid (and people have been hitting it hard).
>
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

-- 
Best regards,
Ilja Golshtein.
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to