On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:14 PM, gonzalo diethelm <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree; it is nice to be able to use a malloc replacement, but a > user-defined allocator gives you more flexibility to do whatever you require > in a particular application. I recall submitting a patch for libzmq with a user-defined allocator that asserted if there was no heap space available. The code now still says 'malloc' but does the assert after every call to it. Even inside libzmq, a user-defined allocator would be cleaner IMO. Plus it allows things like heap use monitoring. +1 but I'm not competent to submit a patch... -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
