On 25 March 2011 17:53, Martin Lucina <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] said: > > On 24 March 2011 19:05, Martin Lucina <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If it's the former, I'll have to sort this out with the Debian guys, > not > > sure if bundling a separate OpenPGM library can get through policy. > > > > > > > > Distributions are likely to prefer separate packaging for the libraries. > I saw > > a couple of days ago packages appearing in Gentoo: > > > > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/net-libs/openpgm > > > > They haven't a ØMQ 2.1 yet: > > > > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/net-libs/zeromq > > Indeed, and that is the preferred way for Debian going forward, I just > wanted to get a 2.1 package out ASAP since packaging libpgm is extra work. > > You can work from this if it helps:
http://groups.google.com/group/openpgm-dev/browse_thread/thread/3d7a955796cfb628/17d5afa55e110a97?lnk=gst&q=Debian+OpenPGM+packages#17d5afa55e110a97 <http://groups.google.com/group/openpgm-dev/browse_thread/thread/3d7a955796cfb628/17d5afa55e110a97?lnk=gst&q=Debian+OpenPGM+packages#17d5afa55e110a97> -- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
