Hi Min, > zmq_device is particularly valuable in Python. Due to Python's infamous > GIL, having > a C-thread that will remain responsive regardless of blocking Python > code (e.g. a FORWARDER device as heartbeat) > is a pretty big deal. > > I imagine that when we bring pyzmq up to speed on 3.0, we will have to > reimplement some amount of zmq_device > in Cython to restore this extremely useful functionality.
I think you misunderstood. The idea is to split devices into a separate project, not to ditch them. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
