On 05/13/2011 06:31 PM, Benn Bollay wrote: >> Not even EPOLLERR? > > I haven't experimented directly, but the documentation indicates that > it just gets cleaned up. There was some mildly related discussion on > this point here: http://lwn.net/Articles/430793/ > > I haven't banged together a test case, but if it is generating an > EPOLLERR, then 0mq surely isn't cleaning up the lingering reference > internally.
Ok. But what are we actually discussing here? 0MQ is surely not expected to be resilient against attaching it to gdb and messing with its internal structures. Are you seeing any problem in real usage? Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
