Hi Mato,

Can you review this patch?

Thanks.
Martin
>From 34ff315c408a373c76ee0db32b4075dd96e98462 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Sustrik <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:38:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Sesion about thread-safeness in zmq(7) simplified

The deleted section, while technically correct, haven't described
the best practice, which made the text confusing.

Signed-off-by: Martin Sustrik <[email protected]>
---
 doc/zmq.txt |    5 -----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/zmq.txt b/doc/zmq.txt
index 0c29a74..191fe13 100644
--- a/doc/zmq.txt
+++ b/doc/zmq.txt
@@ -49,11 +49,6 @@ the caller.
 
 Individual 0MQ 'sockets' are _not_ thread safe except in the case where full
 memory barriers are issued when migrating a socket from one thread to another.
-In practice this means applications can create a socket in one thread with
-_zmq_socket()_ and then pass it to a _newly created_ thread as part of thread
-initialization, for example via a structure passed as an argument to
-_pthread_create()_.
-
 
 Multiple contexts
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-- 
1.7.0.4

_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to