On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Thomas S Hatch <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Ok, I think that this is on the right track, can you all let me know/ > give > > suggestions? > > > https://github.com/thatch45/sandbox/blob/master/examples/zmq/file_get2.py > > > https://github.com/thatch45/sandbox/blob/master/examples/zmq/file_serve2.py > > This is in the right direction. In real life you'd send much larger > fragments. > > One comment, it could be useful to document the patterns you're using > (also for security, in Salt), as unprotocols, along the style of > http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:7 and other little specs evolved from the > Guide. This would have benefits. > > Cheers > Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > Thanks Pieter! Yes, I know the fragment size to far too small, this is just an "academic" example. I have put together a simple spec on the Salt topology, but yes, I should put together something more formal to describe it. Also the Salt topology has been evolving a little more as I have developed it, but I think I am nearing completion! -Thomas S Hatch
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
