On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote:
> My understanding of the problem is that there are two types of applications > with very different semantics... We've called these "stable" and "unstable" parts of the network, in the Guide. There's no reason for needing async connects in 95% of cases, stable or unstable. The only use case I can see is when a node (stable or unstable) connects to an unstable node. This happens, but it's rare (it's the 'server connects to client' scenario). Making connects synchronous won't help all cases of message loss due to synchronization, but it'll catch some cases, and be conceptually simpler and more consistent with 'normal' sockets. I think, anyhow. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
