Hi Gregg, Thanks for that comment. I've added it to the page, and corrected the error you pointed out.
-Pieter On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Pieter, > > Thanks for the 10-minute-talk notes. > > Third paragraph, odd phrase: "you can say exactly thing" > > When explaining any tech product in summary, I tend to split my > comments into facts and opinions; facts being bullet points, not > always provable, and targeted at techs. I lump those together either > at the beginning or end, depending on the audience. For example: > > * It's free and open source. The license is LGPL. > > * It grew out of lessons learned from AMQP and OpenAMQ; the brains at > iMatix being at the core of both. > > * There are language bindings for about 20 languages, including C/C++, > Java, Python, Ruby, .NET, Javascript, and more. (include languages > you know they may care about in this list) > > * It's a library not a daemon. If AMQP is Oracle, 0MQ is SQLite. > > * It's small (one 150K DLL on Windows), simple (only about 20 API > calls), and designed for robustness and performance. > > * Imagine smart sockets that support pub-sub, pipeline, and > request-reply messaging patterns, and atomic multipart message > delivery. > > That part generally takes about 30 seconds. Then I do the narrative > part, explaining the operations and business case, and how it compares > to alternatives. If I'm talking just to techs, we stick with the > details and I show examples. > > So far, I've only had to explain 0MQ once and my demos were pretty > much right out of the guide, with pub-sub+proxy, req-rep+broker, and > parallel pipeline, showing what happens when one component stops or > restarts. > > -- Gregg > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
