On Jun 9, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Artur Brugeman wrote: > > Next time, I'd suggest explaining your scenario first, and solution > > second. It seems you're actually trying to build a new p2p socket > > pattern out of the existing pieces. Patching them won't really work. > > > Ok, next time I won't try to run in front of you and will ask questions > before making suggestions. > > And I now realized that patch doesn't really solve the problem, as connection > establishment is not an atomic operation. So, sorry for taking your time with > this stupid idea.
It wasn't stupid. You worked through the issue step by step and came to a new conclusion. Science! :) cr _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
