Hi Fabien, > You seems to have based your patch on a version anterior to my latest > one (without the lazy ioctl pattern and the SO_RCVTIMEO option). Is > it on purpose (because you disagree with the patch) or just by > distraction or time missing ?
It's because lazy ioctl is unrelated to the SNDTIMEO/RCVTIMEO functionality. I'll merge it later on as a separate patch. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
