Hello all, On 08/07/2011 16:38, Chuck Remes wrote: > On Jul 8, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote: > >> On 07/08/2011 09:04 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: >> >>> The cost is 2 or 6 extra bytes. >> Yes. That's the reason why it's not implemented that way. For VSMs that >> would mean 15% increase in overall memory usage. > Perhaps we could make that a configure option when building the library. That > is, pass a flag to change the zmq_msg_t structure layout to optimize for > memory or for speed (default to memory optimization as it is today). I will be in favor of something similar to this.
Regards Emmanuel Taurel _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
