On 10/15/2011 1:15 PM, Ian Barber wrote: > The logic around this is basically why durable socket on these types > have been removed in 3.0 - the change is big enough it can't be done > in the 2.x branches however. I guess the question is whether it's > worth adding extra functionality of the type you described or waiting > until 3.0 becomes stable.
I didn't realize durable sockets had been removed in 3.0. I'm very glad to hear it! _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
