So just to update you on progress with this.  We have upgraded all boxes to now 
run 2.1.10 and cleaned up some of the code to remove anything that would not 
compile with the new version.  We are currently running the sink to see if the 
problem arises over night.  I am also trying to familiarize myself with the 
inner workings of zmq.  We did try rolling back the version to the previous zmq 
version for the sink but that did not appear to keep up with the traffic.  We 
also are trying to identify if it is a client connecting into the sink that may 
be having an effect.

Hopefully it will remain stable through the night.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henry Geddes
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 5:34 PM
To: ZeroMQ development list
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] C Based ZeroMQ Aggregation Server Problems...

We saw the recv in strace.  It is the system call.  

I am adding all info we have into the bug right now.  We will try the upgrading 
of all programs to 2.1.8 tomorrow and make sure all versions are the same.  Not 
sure what to add as a test case right now as we cannot force a reproduce on 
this.

We will loop back around tomorrow.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pieter Hintjens
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 5:09 PM
To: ZeroMQ development list
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] C Based ZeroMQ Aggregation Server Problems...

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Henry Geddes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are there any known issues when passing messages between 2.1.4 and 2.1.8?  We 
> are just wondering if it may be an incompatibility between versions?

All 2.x versions are compatible, in theory. But indeed this might be
due to a malformed message landing and confusing things. In that case
it should be easy to reproduce.

Ideally we can get this to a reproducible state with a minimal test case.

Did you attach a debugger to the blocked process to see where it's
waiting? There isn't a recvfrom call anywhere in the codebase afaics.

-Pieter
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to