On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Chuck Remes <[email protected]> wrote:
> And looking at ZMQ_RCVMORE and how it is used, I'm not convinced this should > be a property of the socket either. Indeed. This was one of my change proposals for 3.x. It's how CZMQ does it on zframe. > I looked back through all of the message threads from the past 1+ years where > RCVMORE was discussed (it was introduced around April 2010). I could not see > any reason given for why it had to be a socket property. It was historically meant to simplify the API afair. Your proposal is great, yes. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
