On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote:
> What it means is that the only thing that the guide would have to adapt to > when moving to 3.0 is the API change. The 2.1-to-3.0 API change is mostly > transparent to all the languages except for C and C++. Which in turn means > only C and C++ examples in the guide would have to be updated. I have to admit, this is an extremely attractive proposition and will benefit existing applications enormously. > Summary: By reverting to 2.1 like semantics we can make the transition of > the guide to 3.0 much less complex and avoid the duplicate work when moving > to labels in next major version. You've convinced me. +1 to keeping ROUTER/REQ/REP compatibility in 3.0. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
