Hi Chuck,

> I wrote the source patch, docs and a test to verify the behavior. It is 
> signed off according to the rules posted at [1].
>
> Comments?

As discussed before, this is good but backward incompatible change. I 
would suggest sending an email describing what it does, how it breaks 
current semantics and asking people to comment on whether it should go 
to 3.0 or whether it should be staged for later inclusion.

Martin
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to