Yes it is incorrect ... In C #You 1. Manually call Dispose() to free it immediately. 2. Use a using block to state code where its active and the compiler will call Dispose() 3. The Gc will call Dispose() which is only recommended for resources that are not heavily constrained.
2 is the preferred solution for most situations and bypasses some trickyness but in all cases "DIspose()" should dispose of resources. Ben -----Original Message----- From: Paul Betts Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 12:02 PM To: ZeroMQ development list Cc: Ilja Golshtein ; lanre lawal Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] C# socket_close Syntax I don't believe this is correct, the correct way to close a Socket in C# is to Dispose() it. On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/07/2011 11:17 AM, Ilja Golshtein wrote: >> 07.11.2011, 13:54, "Martin Sustrik"<[email protected]>: >>> However, adding the functionality is easy (have a look at other language >>> bindings for inspiration), so I suggest you add the function yourself >>> and ask clrzmq2 maintainers to merge it into the project. >> >> Not sure such an attempt to bypass GC is natural from C# standpoint. > > Other bindings for languages with GCs do the same thing. See, for > exmaple, here; > > https://github.com/zeromq/jzmq/blob/master/src/org/zeromq/ZMQ.java#L334 > > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
