On Nov 14, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Sagi Mann wrote: > Hi all, > > I read the planning page, explaining that if I use a deprecated feature, I > should contact this list, so here I am :^) > > I am looking for a way to reduce the chance of message loss in case I need to > shutdown a client here and there. Currently, I use durable subs. If in future > versions I should not be using durable subs, then what is the long term > solution?
You should take a look at the 'titanic pattern' in the 0mq guide [1]. It is probably your best bet for reliably queueing data across your system, handling crashes, restarts, etc. Improvements to the pattern are welcome. cr [1] http://zguide.zeromq.org/page:all#Disconnected-Reliability-Titanic-Pattern _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
