It's libzmq project on github. Martin
On 11/25/2011 08:41 PM, Stuart Webster wrote: > I think 3.1 should definitely provide MSVC2010 project files. > > Is there a public 3.1 repo to which I could contribute? > > Stuart > > > On 20:59, Martin Sustrik wrote: >> What do you think about moving 3.1 to MSVC2010 and leaving 2.1 as is? >> >> Martin >> >> On 11/25/2011 12:07 AM, Mikko Koppanen wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Stuart >>> Webster<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I think those are practical suggestions. Mikko raised the point that we >>>> shouldn't drop support for VC9 in a point release of 0MQ 2.1 for >>>> reasons >>>> of backwards compatibility. I'm not sure whether he was referring to >>>> compatibility with other components or other toolsets. Could you please >>>> elaborate, Mikko? I can't see how backwards compatibility is a >>>> significant issue. >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2.1 series is currently stable and we cannot change the build files to >>> MSVC10 format (which is not backwards compatible with the earlier >>> versions) in the middle of the cycle. In my opinion stable doesn't >>> mean just the code but also the tools around it including builds. >>> >>> We had a discussions about moving to CMake earlier but I don't think >>> we can give up the autotools due to better cross compilation support. >>> The impression I got from Steven is that CMake is not quite there yet >>> regarding cross builds. Therefore I see very little benefit in adding >>> CMake unless we replace the Windows project files with CMake >>> completely. If not, this just adds another build system to maintain. >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
