Yep. For sure. I got it to fan out with the proper timing using a sync request/rep socket along with Push/pull. Thanks for the help. -- Sean
Omer Bacharach <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Sean. >Regarding the missing messages, try adding a sleep in the publisher >between binding a port and sending > the messages. It looks like it's still connecting to the subscribers > while the first messages are being published. > >Regarding the same messages, well this is by design. Every subscriber >gets the messages the publisher sends. If you wish to divide the work >between subscribers then you should use the Worker, Sink and >Ventilator pattern. > >Hope it helps. > >Regards, >Omer. > > >On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Sean Ochoa <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey all. >> I've got a pub/sub example, which I'm unsure about. It seems that there are >> 2 problems in my example, and I'm not sure what's causing them. >> >> Not all the subscribers are getting messages. >> Some subscribers are getting the same messages as other subscribers. >> >> Here's the source for my test: http://paste.pound-python.org/show/15141/ >> >> Can someone help me understand what I'm doing wrong? >> Thanks! >> Sean >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> > > > >-- >Omer Bacharach >Director of Software Development >Toot Trading Ltd. >[email protected] >Mobile +972-544-317959 >Office +972-3-7449466 >_______________________________________________ >zeromq-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
