I actually don't need to do subscription filtering, but I also don't want to block on HWM, so that's why I was thinking of PUB-SUB model.
-Andrei On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Ian Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Ian Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Andrei Zmievski <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I have several C worker processes that need to send data to a single >>> Java process that will collect and aggregate it. I was thinking of binding >>> on a SUB socket in the Java process and then connecting to the same >>> endpoint on a PUB socket in each C one. Would this work or is there a >>> better pattern for this? >>> >>> -Andrei >>> >> >> It would work, but you'll probably find binding a PULL socket and having >> multiple processes PUSH to it will be a better bet, unless you want the >> drop on HWM properties of pubsub. >> >> Ian >> > > Oh, and hey Andrei! The other thing that comes to mind is if you wanted to > filter messages on your SUB side with the subscription matching. But you > would probably be better served by push/pull for most cases. > > Ian > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
