Gabriele, [email protected] said: > I will, looking at all the responses it seems that there's more > interest for it than I had predicted :-)
>From my investigation of IB/RDMA it looks like the APIs are typical enterprise stuff. Big and complex. The benefit of having a single API (ZeroMQ) which you could use for all applications would be huge. > I've already added a --enable-rdma option in my local repository plus > the necessary checks and it's looking good. Would --with-rdma be > preferred? In autoconf it's usually used for options where you need to > specify something (e.g. --with-stuff=mystuff) while --enable is used > for on/off flags. --enable-rdma is fine, I tend to confuse --with-stuff and --enable-stuff. Of course you might want --with-rdma=prefix for people who have things installed outside of the standard places. > That sounds good, I'll create a branch on GitHub ASAP though I have to > go through their docs first as I have never used the service before. You can also use your own Git hosting and/or send patches and pull requests by email if you'd prefer that, there's no requirement to use Github for contributing. -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
