On 12/20/2011 02:29 AM, Daniel Lundin wrote: >> Blocking seems the right strategy since it's consistent with other >> reliable outgoing sockets. > > +1 it's what I would expect as well. > > What about zmq_setsockopt? Should there be a nonblocking version of > ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE to emulate behavior of send (on XSUB)? > > Masking perhaps? > > zmq_setsockopt(sub_s, ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE | ZMQ_NOBLOCK, "foo", 3) > > Too ugly? :)
Note that there's an XSUB socket underneath the SUB socket. Those not happy with the amount of control provided by SUB socket can use raw XSUB socket instead. XSUB treats subscriptions as standard messages so you get all the control you possibly get. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
