Martin, I understand better the 'unfortunate' issue - the conflation of 1) and 2), not the existence of 2) altogether. Thanks for the clarification. I quite liked where the LABEL work was going, making a clear distinction between the two. I did play with it some (the pyzmq bindings supported a 'prefix' to send_multipart), and I think it was heading in the right direction. I do hope we see a revisiting of that idea in a more formal way, though it will likely make a difficult transition for application authors who want to work against libzmq with/without that feature for a period of time.
-MinRK On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 17:58, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23/01/12 02:49, Martin Lucina wrote: > >> I did not follow the LABEL work, but IIUC the problem was you tried to >> satisfy point 4) above by breaking point 2), right? > > Nope. The functionality was still there. The idea was to use one flag > for 0MQ-level message parts (ZMQ_LABEL) and another flag for > application-level message parts (ZMQ_MORE). > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
