Hi, I think that posting of 0MQ-related jobs on the ML is OK. If any spam appears, additional measures can be taken.
Btw, I also have zeromq group on linked-in that's not used for anything at the moment. If people believe linking their linked-in CVs to the group would be useful, I am happy to pass the group ownership to 0MQ community. Martin On 24/01/12 08:58, Gleb Peregud wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:42, Al Tobey<[email protected]> wrote: >> Thoughts? > > I'm coming from Erlang Questions mailing list, which is basically a > catch-all mailing list for Erlang community (except for bugs and > formal process of extending the language). And job postings in there > are not discouraged and there's no need for moderation of those. > Generally signal:noise ratio is very good, and there is basically no > spam. In last 2-3 years there were only few instances of irrelevant > job postings. I have a feeling that ZeroMQ is a niche technology (like > Erlang) and there should not be very many job postings, since IMO most > recruiters have never heard of ZeroMQ. While Perl is a very well known > technology and much-much more people know about it, so solution from > Perl mailing list might be an overkill. > > Best regards, > Gleb Peregud > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
