On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Michael Compton <[email protected]> wrote: > Indeed that works for me as well. Well spotted. > > But this is incorrect behaviour in my opinion. The Dealer should not > have to 'prod' the router 'awake'. I'm sure you agree this was not the > case before and shouldn't be the case now.
Indeed, DEALER and ROUTER are supposed to behave identically in 3.x and 2.x; if they don't it's a bug. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
