Hi Martin,
Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, I have several test cases developed
for most of
the ZeroMQ example patterns, including standard pub/sub, fan-in,
fan-out, peer-to-peer
and router/dealer (broker pattern). All work perfectly well when using
TCP and/or IPC
endpoints.
Moving back to ZeroMQ 2.1.11 seems to have resolved my problem with
EPGM. I'll stick
with ZeroMQ 2.1.11 for the time being and will wait for 3.1 to come out
of beta before
trying again.
Thanks
--Corey
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Lucina
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 7:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] EPGM on Linux 4.1.2
Hi William,
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:45:37 -0500
William Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> On my Mac, this works great, except that I do have to substitute my
> IP address for the interface name.
> On my Linux system the bind and connect work and the publisher
> appears to be publishing the messages.
> The problem is that the receiver is getting nothing. The eth0
> interface does contain the following
> "UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 etc, etc..... I've got
> plenty of sleep in the example
> program between subscriber start and publisher start, so I shouldn't
> be missing any messages.
>
> Any thoughts on why this program doesn't work on Linux?
Sanity check - does the same program work on your Linux box if you use tcp://
endpoints instead of epgm://?
You might want to check on the publisher side with Wireshark or tcpdump to see
if the multicast packets are actually hitting the network.
Cheers,
-mato
--
Martin Lucina <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
