On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Ian Barber <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is it possible that this API should simply be on a different calls, a > zmq_bind_assign or similar, to avoid this clash? This could then work with > all transports: > > tcp/pgm: bind to random port > ipc: bind to random free name in system tmp > inproc: bind to random free name That would work, but so would a less surprising zmq_bind plus a getsockopt with return value depending on transport type. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
