On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 14:39, john skaller <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On 04/02/2012, at 7:30 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:57 PM, john skaller > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> So I would stop feeling nervous about vetting of patches .. and start > >> feeling nervous about the lack of test code :) > > > > Actually there is test code, lots of it, written on top of the > > bindings. PyZMQ for instance has a huge test suite that has caught > > several major regressions. > > Oh really? I didn't know that. Can someone point me at this code? > Python tests would suit me well. > PyZMQ tests are meant to test pyzmq itself, not libzmq. But there are ~100 tests, and regressions in libzmq have shown up a number of times as crashes or failures in pyzmq. The test suite is here: https://github.com/zeromq/pyzmq/tree/master/zmq/tests > Why not ship all that code with libzmq for testing? > That would mean shipping the entire Python binding with libzmq. > > -- > john skaller > [email protected] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
