[email protected] said: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm kind of wondering about the private email conversations you, PH > > and MS had. Would it be possible to publish some of those > > conversations on this list? > > I'm not OK with that. Private emails are not for public display, and > publishing them would be a breach of confidence, and copyright. > > But open discussion, sure. This is an important matter and affects us > all, and my intention is to make sure everyone's voice is heard and > consensus opinion is implemented.
I have reviewed the relevant email threads in question, and it is my opinion that there is nothing of commercial importance in them. On the contrary, they do concern the ZeroMQ community. I would like to go on the record as stating: The threads in question are the full conversations defined by the following root messages: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:35:32 -0600 From: Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> To: Martin Lucina <[email protected]>, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> Subject: 3.1 release Message-ID: <cadl5_sid35nnfgeikyylqoamsgnc4xnzzr3duyddv7kk237...@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20111218_183555_619641_B879003B) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:16:54 +0900 From: Martin Lucina <[email protected]> To: Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: 3.1 releases, Distributions Wiki page Message-Id: <[email protected]> If, and only if, both Pieter Hintjens and Martin Sustrik give their consent to making these conversations public, in their entire and unredacted form, then I also give my consent to making these conversations public, in their entire and unredacted form. -mato
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
