We've implemented this as well, and have reversed the bind/connect points
as suggested by the OP such
that logging "server" binds the endpoint (consumes the resource) and the
processes (things that produce log messages)
connect to the endpoint. Works great.
--Corey
________________________________
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lucas Hope
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 9:43 PM
To: ZeroMQ development list
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] How to implement fan in?
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Brian Smith
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Nope. You're perfectly welcome to have the pull bind.
I do this for logging a simple multi-process app and it works well for me.
Peace,
-Luke
Sent with Sparrow<http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
On Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 6:25 PM, snacktime wrote:
I can't find anyone documenting how to do a fan in.
Specific scenario. I have a multithreaded app. Most of the threads
handle requests, a few threads are dedicated for things like logging.
So I want all my worker threads to send their log messages to the
single logging thread. What I really want is a fan in using push
pull, only with one puller that binds and all the pushers connect.
Every example I see makes push bind and pull connect. Is there any
reason why it cant' be the opposite?
Chris
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
--
---------------------------------------------------
Dr Lucas Hope - lucas.r.hope@skype
Machine Learning and Software Engineering Consultant
Melbourne, Australia
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
