On 10/02/2012, at 12:42 AM, Calvin de Vries wrote: > I'm not sure I agree that ZMQ_AFFINITY should be modified at all. I think > that it would be most beneficial if you could still use ZMQ_AFFINITY so that > a socket is on a particular I/O thread that has already been pinned to a > specific CPU.
The intent was to either upgrade or subsume it. ZMQ_AFFINITY only supports 32 or 64 processors (depending on word size, I think). The idea is to either change it or add another tag name that works with an arbitrarily long array. I already pointed out the 64 processor limit, which is inappropriately small even for todays larger systems, and tomorrow your phone will probably have 4096 cores.. :) -- john skaller [email protected] _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
