On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:39 PM, john skaller <[email protected]>wrote:
> > I agree, I'm actually a bit confused why they were dropped. > > I am guessing because there was only one in the library? > Not so much - it's more that they were very much application level components, so didn't fit - there was a concern people weren't developing new devices because of the built in ones (one) were seen as 'sanctioned'. So the real problem with devices is that to use them you need > a framework including a scheduler and integrated event driven > operation. This is a whole level higher than 0MQ, and the result > is no longer really a library (frameworks are anti-libraries :) > > Hmm ... > > Build it! Demonstrate the power of felix :) Seriously, there is a definite gap for a library of small components that solve various problems - along the lines of the old ZFL. Ian
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
