Ah, no :) Boost is one thing that I try to avoid. I'm actually more of
a "C" guy that "C++" and zmq has been nice to have first and foremost
"C" interface, even if written in "C++".
I was more thinking of the second solution:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/1564907/743263
"From the winsock layer: WSAAddressToString (ntop) and
WSAStringToAddress (pton)", although there is a comment from someone:
"Note that WSAAddressToString will append the port number as well if
your address structure has one. So to just get the IP, you may have to
create a new address with no port. "
But for now I'm sticking to the change before Ian Barber's one (which
seems very cool indeed, but unfortunately relying on something that XP
does not support).
There might be somewher "inet_ntop.c" compat layer for XP (probably
part of mingw/cygwin), but I haven't started digging yet.
On 2/16/2012 11:58 AM, Boris Gulay wrote:
> 16.02.2012 22:43, Dimiter 'malkia' Stanev пишет:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> In short: inet_ntop is not available in Windows XP.
> I write message about that five hours ago (subject "Compile branch with
> MSVC"). :)
> I agree, this function should not be used if we want ZeroMQ compile on
> XP. But your solution is not acceptable because it requires boost library.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
