Il 19/02/2012 14:20, john skaller ha scritto: >> Why not? 0MQ will transfer them efficiently. > > Actually on second thoughts, you're *better* off using 0MQ for the > transport because you have more facilities to manage it. > For example you could send an acknowledgement including > a checksum back upstream to confirm the transfer. > > You're better off trusting one carrier than two.
Ok, I will follow this way. If I understand well the documentation I need to read the source file in small block of data, because 0MQ cannot manage large file directly. Thus, I can receive an acknowledge for each block and tell the user the working in progress percentage. How to select the best size for those blocks? Marco _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
