On 22/02/2012, at 12:49 AM, Jess Morecroft wrote: > My suspicion is > that a temporary solution of high water-marks, replaced by a proper > solution of using 0mq 3.1 once stable, is probably the way forward.
Whether or not using high water marks is a temporary solution, shouldn't you always have them? Everything in production code should be bounded, even if the bounds are large. -- john skaller [email protected] _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
