Hi Steffen, On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Steffen Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Again, I'd appreciate review before I run with it in my Perl implementation. >
Is there any good reason to specify both, socket types and device type? I'd say device type is redundant. The point is even more stronger as device type names are misleading. I'd say they should be "request-reply", "publish-subscribe", "push-pull" if needed at all. Is there any good reason to specify "xrep" vs "rep" socket types? I think it's implementation defined of whether it supports request multiplexing or other specific features of "x" kind of socket. -- Paul _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
