On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Michel Pelletier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Setting a HWM to 1 is, to me, an anti-pattern. It specifically makes > you have to think about these very issues you bring up, and it negates > the ability for the message paths to naturally surge and and ebb as > load varies. It won't work accurately in any case, since there are other network queues. It does sound like you want an LRU queue, or perhaps a more generic type of credit-based flow control[1]. -Pieter [1] http://unprotocols.org/blog:15 _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
